Happy Birthday to...
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Sword of Honor |
|||
|
The fact is that there are BILLIONS of people out there. Claiming that someone you met at work or school is "the perfect girl for me" is ludicrous
when you haven't even met an infitisimal fraction of a percent of all the girls in the world. So, therefore, we (1) settle, or (2) go with the best
we've had so far.
|
|||
CDogMan |
|||
|
Or, we pause, play, and sample our way through life
|
|||
hooligans |
|||
|
like we sample a box of chocolates? I always cut mine in half so I know what I'm getting. I don't like surprises...
|
|||
CDogMan |
|||
hooligans wrote: I love suprises.... Gump you are not..... intelligence ensures surprises... I think intelligent women will tolerate the scrutiny yet provide suprises because they are smart, witty...... witty is a big deal too.... Yep, I try to peal off layers to see... but witty is fun and engaging... I like surprises |
|||
Badesumofu |
|||
the difference being you're talking about different times...What about at the same time? Wouldn't it just be a lot of noise? Thankyou I think that in most cases, people who think they're in love with two people at once are just wrong. They're feeling something, and mistakenly believe that it's the experience of being in love. |
|||
CDogMan |
|||
I can imagine that being possible for exeptionally freakish individualsName calling.... Thats ok I am used to it It does depend on what you define "In Love" as. If you definintion includes "forsaking all others" then you are correct. But that comes from your Paradigm, not everyone shares that.. I think that in most casesUnderstanding that it is your opinion scores points. Most people dont get that their opinions are not facts.. Not saying they cannot be.. But most dont get they can "not be" as well This is a nice discussion.... everyone is playing nice |
|||
Velvetland |
|||
|
well I have several friends for are polyamorus and there seems to be one common thread between them all. now I am not saying that is true for everyone but it
seems like people who don't have love for themselves, require extra love from external sources, but it's never enough because the love they are
actually looking for is not external but from the inside.
that being said - everyones loves more then one person at a time. It's just a different kind of love. I love my mother. I have love for my friends (we tell each other 'i love you' on a regular basis) as there is such a thing as platonic love (which is no second prize to romantic love, though it is often overlooked in modern society and viewed as second class). I have to agree with Denise. If I truly am IN love with someone, I don't feel the need to look for that kind of love elsewhere. I still have platonic love and such but for me its monogamy. I don't know - what do you guys think is the difference between platonic love and romantic love? is romantic love just platonic love + desire? or is it different then that? |
|||
Badesumofu |
|||
|
Freakish, when used in that context, is actually complimentary.
The way I view being in love, it's not making a choice to forsake all others, you're just not capable of falling in love with another person. I see it as being an active/passive distinction to an extent. Loving someone can be passive, being in love is very active. Love is a verb, love is a doing word. And as I say, unless you are a freak, you can't do it to two people at once. |
|||
Sword of Honor |
|||
|
Why not? Can you love both your parents? Can you love all your kids? There's no reason why I can love all my wives.
Oh, wait.............. |
|||
hooligans |
|||
Gump you are not....Gump, I am- quite often... Freakish, when used in that context, is actually complimentary.Then CDog is the biggest freak I know....
I've never thought of it that way before, Bades. I think we can be IN love with more than one person, but not for long. It's draining because of all the" noise" and the extra work/emotions involved- so we can't maintain it for very long. One love has to win out in the end. Or you go crazy. Unless you are a freak...like Cdog and Sword....*grin* but it seems like people who don't have love for themselves, require extra love from external sources, but it's never enough because the love they are actually looking for is not external but from the inside.Velvet...that's very perceptive of you. I think you are absolutely right. Maybe not in all cases-but most. what do you guys think is the difference between platonic love and romantic love? is romantic love just platonic love + desire?Yes- that's what I would think the difference is. Romantic love has the desire/passion factor built in...otherwise, I would be wanting to sleep with all my friends...instead of just a few of them. KIDDING. |
|||
SovereignAKA |
|||
|
I'd say yes, I do know of three gay men who've been living together happily for about years. It does take a certain type of personality to make it work
though.
|
|||
CDogMan |
|||
|
Bades.. I knew what you meant. I was teasing you.. Hooli thinks I am a freak? Imagine that.. LMAO Romance and Eros are not the same thing. They are often found together, but do not require one another to exist. Definitions of romance on the Web: love affair: a relationship between two lovers
|
|||
hooligans |
|||
|
Definition of Chat Up @ NFBB: CDogman
|
|||
H3nLA |
|||
|
Bades,
if love is an action word, please explain in your own words, the difference in: 1)Being in Love 2) Loving someone |
|||
CDogMan |
|||
hooligans wrote: So, I am not serious....
Last Edited By: CDogMan
07/25/08 03:38 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
Velvetland |
|||
CDogMan wrote: don't be sad cdog, here - have a cookie |
|||
CDogMan |
|||
|
Thanks,, I need cookie energy to work today. You may have just saved my life. Unlike SOME girls here that think me shallow and nothing more than a plaything to
be teased (Hooli)!!
|
|||
hooligans |
|||
|
I'm sorry...I was just teas...err....Kidding. I don't think you're shallow at all...you know that.
|
|||
Velvetland |
|||
|
awe here hooli have a cookie
|
|||
Badesumofu |
|||
|
Right. H3 - "love is a verb, love is a doing word" is a Massive Attack lyric, from the song Teardrop. It popped into my head as I writing up my last
post. So my idea, is that love can happen roughly in 3 different ways (this is a pretty rough outline, doesn't cover everything etc).
The first stage is what I've sometimes described as 'love feelings'. These are what you feel early in a relationship (primarily) when you're with the person, and you get a tingle, or a glow - you feel love for that person in that moment. It's too early to say "I love you", because the feeling is fleeting. This can come from romantic entanglements, and it can also come from friends, relatives, anyone who makes you happy, I guess. Then you have love, this is where you love someone. I love my parents, in a way, I love my brother, although we aren't the closest brothers in the world, I do. If something bad happened to them, I'd be upset. If someone tried to hurt them, I'd fuck them up. As I go through life, they aren't always on my mind though. I don't walk down the street overwhelmed with how much I love my Mum. When I do think about them, though, I think nice thoughts. So it's sort of passive. Loving my family is not something I'm doing 24/7, but if you ever ask me if I love my Dad, I'll say yes, and then I will feel a nice feeling as I think about the things I love about him, for instance, the way he (and consequently, I) nit-picks about grammar. But I don't think of this as active, it's not something I'm doing all the time. Finally, there is being in love. I don't want this post to turn into an ode to romance, so I'll keep this short. Being in love is characterised by constant desire for the adored object. It resembles obsession in many ways, you think about her first thing when you wake up, last thing before you go to sleep. Whenever you have an inspiration, you feel that somehow it came out of your love for her. It's something you're constantly in the process of doing. I'm not saying it lasts forever, certainly statistics indicate that it doesn't always go that way. It's not just something in the background of your mind; it's not just something that you think of when reminded. I cannot imagine being in love with two people at once. Nearly all of us love multiple people, but being in love is something else. It's reserved for romantic love, and it's a constant action. |
|||
Happy birthday to...