A person has every right to kill another person if the other person is attempting to murder or rape her.

Therefore, the death penalty is justifiable for rape or murder.

If the victim believes that having her rapist executed is too extreme, she should be free to opt for (A) the removal of the penis of her rapist, (B) exorbitant monetary restitution, or (C) any other, lesser punishment. (She should also be free to fully exonerate her aggressor if she chooses.)

It is a violation of a person's rights to be touched without his consent, even if the touch is as innocent as merely touching a person on his shoulder. But although this is a natural crime against the touched party, in virtually all cases, the touched party will exonerate his toucher, considering the quick and painless interaction between his shoulder and the other person's hand so innocent that to actually press charges is a waste of his time. However, if he does take his case to an arbitor, the arbitor should rule in his favour, since he does have a right to not be touched without his consent. What punishment should the arbitor place on the toucher in this case? It seems rational to me that the restitution debt should be extremely low, perhaps as low as a dollar. (It's hard to say exactly what cost the market will set for this infraction since we do not yet have a free market, polycentric legal system.)

Domestic violence is clearly more liberticidal than merely touching someone on the shoulder to get his attention, and thus should be treated with appropriate severity.

Finally, if a person engages in cat-calls against another, the so-called victim should get nothing, since cat-calls do not violate his natural rights, and since the person engaging in cat-calling ought to be recognised as having free speech based upon her property rights in her own mouth and mind. To force her to pay the person she cat-called even a cent is a grave violation of the cat-caller's natural rights. The only just punishment for such things as cat-calling and verbal abuse is the act of shunning and boycotting the cat-caller or verbal abuser. (With that said, I highly recommend reading Dr. Long's "Why We Fight (the Power).")

In summation, depending upon the nature of the incident, the correct punishment can range anywhere from nothing to execution. In any event, no prosecution should ever take place without the victim's consent.